The evaluation


The PhD admission process will rate the candidates against pre-established criteria that will gauge their preparatory skills and aptitude for scientific research. The complete selection procedure will include the following steps:

STEP 1. Admissibility and eligibility check

Candidates will be checked against the admissibility and eligibility criteria (deadline, submission systems, mobility rule, and correspondence to the definition of “early-stage researcher”). In cases of evident clerical error, the PhD Office may ask the candidate to provide missing information or supporting documents. If the missing information or document would substantially change the candidature, it will not be taken into account.

STEP 2. Evaluation

2a) Preliminary selection: According to the application form, candidates will be assessed on the basis of an evaluation grid. The members of the Evaluation Commissions will draft an Evaluation Report for each application and will meet to assign a final score to each candidate. During this phase, the candidates’ proposals for PhD research projects will also be evaluated and assigned a score. Candidates passing this quality threshold will be invited for interviews.

Criteria for the Preliminary selection Score Weight
1. Excellence of the candidate

Coherence and quality of his/her education
Experience in research (if any)
Quality of scientific outputs (e.g. publications)
Any other relevant work experience

Score 1:
Range 0-5
Threshold 3/5
50%
2. Excellence of the proposed research project

Coherence of the proposed research project in the advertised research sector
Clarity and pertinence of the objectives
Soundness of the concept and credibility of the proposed methodology

Score 2:
Range 0-5
Threshold 3/5
50%
Total Score (1 + 2)   Threshold 6/10  

2b) Interview: The interview (about 30-45 minutes) will determine in detail the quality of the candidate, his/her planned PhD research project and his/her motivation. All interviews will be conducted by videoconference.

Criteria for the Interview Score Weight
1. Excellence of the candidate

Coherence and quality of his/her education
Experience in research (if any)
Quality of scientific outputs (e.g. publications)
Any other relevant work experience
Knowledge of the subject(s) relevant to the chosen PhD course

Score 1:
Range 0-5
Threshold 3/5
40%
2. Excellence of the proposed research project

Clarity and pertinence of the objectives
Soundness of the concept and credibility of the proposed methodology

Score 2:
Range 0-5
Threshold 3/5
40%
3. Potential of the candidate

Coherence between the candidate’s motivation and career prospects
Capacity of the candidate to reach a position of professional maturity at the end of the PhD course
Evidence of creative independent thinking and originality

Score 3:
Range 0-5
No threshold
20%
Total Score (1 + 2 + 3)  Threshold 6/15  

STEP 3. Award decision

Following the evaluation process, if two or more candidates applying for the same PhD position have the same score, the candidate belonging to the less-represented gender (in first instance) or the youngest (in second instance) will be chosen. All candidates will be informed about the outcome of the selection process with an Evaluation Summary Report.